My BlogSpot Can Blogs Save the World was created in 2009. It is ironic that many of the articles that were written about the future have come true and are being noticed by people with real influence. I mean, who cares about what a southerner with an Alabama upbringing says? He is clearly behind the times, right? Those in New York and California – they are the smartest ones when it comes to geopolitics and international economics right? Well, hard times bring new ideas as the boat sinks apparently.
My introduction article in 2009 says,
I envision this blog as a way to discuss some current topics, some of the topics may be complex and/or controversial. However, anything nowadays that gets our minds to thinking out of the box I am all for it.
Let's start with "ideas or visions", transform them to "blogs", allow our brains to "absorb" the information, whilst we bounce them (the ideas) around a little, and then "save the world" ;) Let's also enjoy the fellowship while we do it!!!
The irony of the name of my blog is that it is called “Can Blogs Save the World?” This name is visionary considering that much of my political theory posts were about China’s rise and the decline of the US due to unbalanced trade deficits. Basically, us giving China trillions of dollars as apposed to them giving us mere thousands through the greatest trade imbalance and transfer of wealth that the world has ever seen. Likewise with each passing year, China became richer and we became poorer (in debt). Decades of this has brought us to this point.
Who besides me continually says stupid stuff like, “China entered the World Trade Organization (WTO) on 12/11/2001 exactly two months after the 9/11/2001 World Trade Tower Attacks may not be a coincidence.” It was the same day of the month, on the 11th. Wow. Brilliance. It's like someone wanted to screw with our heads. In one day, in one attack, our intelligence and financial resources suddenly shifted off of China and Russia and to the Middle East, overnight. No one seemed to care about the China and WTO connection. It was an unseen ghost that would one day become visible and change the world. You know. Stuff like huge transfers of wealth and power to China and BRICS and alliances and world influence and Taiwan. Also, China building military bases in other countries and building alliances with those countries that will ultimately benefit the PRC. World domination kind of stuff.
So, did Russia and/or China train some terrorists in the sand of Saudi Arabia to fly planes into the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001 for strategic purposes to hide their entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO)? Did the terrorists get the idea from the plane that hit David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan building on 5th Avenue years ago? Theory or fact? Who knows really? If it happened, are any of the strategic planners, influencers or people with knowledge of it still alive? Perhaps we killed them all in retaliation. Conspiracy theory? If there was outside influence will we ever hear of it and even if we found proof, what would we do about it at this point? Go to war? Easy to beat Iraq but not so much larger countries.
Motive. We ask questions like, “Did and do the Chinese and Russians want the West to decline or fall while they take the lead in World Politics?” Sure. Russia, in particular, seems butthurt all the time about the power of the West. It is no secret. “Was the motive for China and/or Russia to give ideas and intelligence to terrorists to commit the attacks?” Sure, there was plenty of motive. They knew the US would bomb the hell out of the Middle East and make new enemies there while they took the neutral approach and great opportunity of staying out of the war. And, they strategically networked and significantly improved their relations in other countries. Also, they might have known that the US would take most of its intelligence resources off of China and Russia and divert a large portion of its money, time and people to the Middle East and domestic terrorism. In other words, “quit spending resources on collecting intelligence on China and Russia so they can covertly plot to take over the New World Order in the upcoming decades. Plan for the century, not just one Presidential or Congressional term. Not one CIA director's term. No one FBI director's term. Does it now make more sense that Putin has been in power since 1999 and Xi Jinping since 2012. But it was Putin in power just before the 9/11 attacks, not Xi Jinping. Did Putin have boots on the ground in the sands of Afghanistan at the time? Sure he did. Doesn't mean for certain Russia had anything at all to do with the attacks but certainly there was plenty of motive and having a strong Rockefeller and NYC presence with plenty of communication and contact, the Russians surely knew about the airplane that hit Rockefeller's bank on 40 Wall Street. That's recorded history but probably still on the tongue of many people, especially David Rockefeller (at least, while he was alive).
In all civil and criminal court cases the smartest of judges and lawyers understand that MOTIVE is important. Without motive, there is no criminal case and the guy is almost always innocent. But if there is motive, particularly STRONG MOTIVE, then it increases the probability that the person or country is GUILTY. Do the Chinese and Russians have motive for us to use all of our intelligence resources domestically and continue to keep our eyes off of them? Absolutely. Do the Chinese and Russian have motive for us to fight internally? Absolutely. Do they have motives for us to bankrupt our nation and lose credit among all of the other nations in the world? Absolutely. Would they want our people poor and perhaps a revolution started in the United States? Absolutely. Would they want a change of government and influence elections and put in their puppets to change policy and law that benefits the Chinese? Absolutely. I’ve said this before and will say it again, “It’s cheaper to bribe a politician than build a missile. It’s cheaper to bribe Congress than go to war.” You can quote me on that.
I mean who gave these foreign sand terrorists the idea to use airplanes anyway? Admittedly, fresh ideas can occasionally pop into someone's head but usually not. Usually, the brain uses repetition, not creativity. Perhaps the idea came from someone or a group of people in NYC who had firsthand experience with an airplane hitting NYC buildings? The Empire State building in 1945. The Chase Manhattan building on 40 Wall Street in 1946. Moreover, the Twin towers were often dubbed Nelson and David [Rockefeller] by the press because of their family’s involvement in donating the land for the UN and their influence and involvement in the towers.
BTW, 40 Wall Street is better known by its current name – The Trump Building. And the Trump Organization owned the old Chase Manhattan building in 2001 during the time of the attacks. Again, at least hundreds of thousands of people have passed through the building over the years and a certain percentage heard the story about the plane crashing into it.
Even though my belief that the idea of the 9/11/2001 plane attacks came from the airplane that hit David Rockefeller’s building, I obviously cannot say who. Certainly, I can't see a benefit to David Rockefeller or Donald Trump. Thousands of people have frequented Chase Manhattan and The Trump Tower over the year and the history might even be still circulating around with its current owner and employees. And let's not forget that a plane hit the Empire State Building and lots of people probably remember that history as well. But what does seem to confirm that the information was somehow connected to David Rockefeller or his Chase Manhattan building (in my mind) is David Rockefeller's connection to the Twin Towers. This combined with the airplane hitting his bank, Chase Manhattan. David was born in 1915 so the airplane was certainly on his mind. He most likely visited the site of the crash. He also admitted to watching the planes hit the towers in real time as he smoked a cigar in an adjacent building (Memoirs; David Rockefeller). And David also had a tremendous amount of influence. That rascal was somehow given the green light to make many travels to Moscow and visit with leadership of the Soviet Union and China and yet was not even be suspected as being a double agent of agent of the Soviets. Or even influenced (directly or indirectly) by the Soviets. Did David Rockefeller have CIA connections. Absolutely, in my mind there is no doubt. Just as he had Soviet connections and PRC connections and Henry Kissinger connections. David Rockefeller who alongside his buddy Henry Kissinger used their influence to push the détente with China on all of us which included China’s entrance into the WTO exactly two months after the tower attacks.
Let’s face it, Rockefeller lobbied successfully for all of the trade agreements that shut down much of the manufacturing in the US including NAFTA. They did so by explaining that we would still hold onto the tech sector and stay ahead of China. Did China agree to stay away from the tech sector? Not to my knowledge but we are now complaining about it as if we expected them to stay away from tech if we gave them our manufacturing industry. They certainly did not listen. Perhaps a backroom handshake isn't' enough to "seal the deal?" Consequently, the manufacturing sector been nearly destroyed due to China. The PRC is also on a fast rising pace with the tech sector, military technology and equipment as well.
So if the idea to transfer much of the wealth of the US over decades was to protect David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger's generation from nuclear war, it worked. But it ended just before they died. They both got made their 100th birthday but left us in a bad situation. We are safe as long as we give China the unbalanced trade, basically giving them an excess of cash, but what happens now that they have become more powerful, influentially, politically, monetarily, when we quit giving them that excess of cash? We will be no longer needed, hence increasing the risk of many undesired consequences of that.
So, I won’t get into details about the reasons behind the rise of China and decline of the developed countries because I already have half a dozen videos posted and blogs written about all of that from over 15 years ago. You know, back when it would have been easier to slow it down or reverse the process without going into World War III with them. When the caveman rubs two sticks together, he creates fire. Likewise with politics, domestic or geopolitically, rubbing the sticks together too fast creates nuclear war. A slower process of change lowers the risk of war. Changes over a four year term might be too fast and too much friction and create fire (literally).
I did not initially intend today's blog to be about all of that. My mind works in complicated rabbit holes. My main intent is the same as my the name of my blog, "Can Blogs Change the World [for the better?] Better means, freedom loving countries survive. The focus of this article and many of the others was and is an attempt to get the world out and change current events in order to change future events and to divert them into a more palatable living for the West and its allies. A different and more positive trajectory in the time line, short of a time machine to the future and seeing the world up in flames and coming back to warn everyone, I have tried to warn in advance.
And I am not just talking about just a strong government, but also a strong citizenry. Because if the citizens are weak the government will be weak. After all, politicians come from the population right? If the population is dumbed down and poor then Congress will be dumbed down and corrupt.
Almost everything comes down to resources and energy. I am not talking about electricity. I am talking about manpower, technology and focus. What will we spend it on? We certainly shifted way from China and Russia who have full motive to take us down as they rise. There are more important things in the world than the Middle East. Speaking of, who will have the most influence with them in the future if we do not change our thinking, policy and laws for a long term strategic plan.
Be strong, stay strong. That's my idea. We have to prioritize strengthening ourselves. The young lion doesn't attack the old lion until he knows for certain the old lion cannot win. Otherwise, he instinctually knows he will die. Likewise, China will continued the strategy, infiltration and covert subversion until they know they are strong enough to win. They are not stupid.
So, in my all so humble but strong opinion, there are many downsides to the United States declining and China continuing to rise. And despite my jumping around to different yet interconnected subjects in today’s article, I will leave the final focus on this idea and the reason it absolutely has to be reversed, yet reversed in way that will not lead to World War III and particularly nuclear war and the end of the world.
The Untied States has benefited from being the most powerful country in the world. People want to side with winners. They want to side with the rich and powerful, not the weak and 50 trillion in national debt. They want to learn English, not Chinese.
It has benefited out intelligence community as well. The adversary’s country sucks and the United States has money and other benefits that encourages information collection by the United States government. So that’s a two-part system. Again, US is great, their country sucks and treats them badly. If the US ever, and I mean, ever, starts oppressing its own citizens and if China ever begins to treat theirs better, then there will be a problem. The US has benefited from being a great nation with a wealthy and happy population for many decades now. China on the other hand did not. But now that many of the major cities in the US are in decline and cities in China are incredible, things are beginning to change. The transfer of wealth from the developed countries to China is a serious problem. But if you stop the transfer immediately, there is a high risk for a major war. If you stop it slowly, but consistently over a decade or two, then it might just work and tensions simmer.
So what happens if China becomes richer and the US becomes poorer? China will have the advantages that the US has had for half a century. Nearly all of those advantages. Countries in the world will want China to build military bases on their native lands. They will want China’s assistance in intelligence matters. They will supply China with information on China’s adversaries, and they will freely give the information to them. Our county’s superpowers to turn an adversarial officer into a covert agent working for the US government will become increasingly more difficult, albeit nearly impossible. For one thing we won’t have the budget to turn them. Secondly, China will have the money, power and influence to turn our officers into one of theirs. This isn’t even considering the private sector, where many of our intelligence officers and agents leave our government to work for a newly globalized private sector. A powerful globalist private sector is another article to write another day as it poses as much of a security risk as anything else that is mentioned herein.
To simplify, what happens when the US has less money to spend on intelligence and counterintelligence and China has more money to spend on intelligence and counterintelligence? China will exponentially hit that tipping point of no return. The sort of tipping point that is quietly lurking below the icy waters like an iceberg awaiting the titanic to brush past and sink.
I am not saying these things because I am angry or sad or despise the US in any way. I am bringing it up because I love my country and want my family and descendants to have a great opportunity to live the good life, work hard and have a little something for their troubles. You know, that thing they call “the American Dream.” Because if you lose the dream, you lose the country. And people aren’t stupid. That’s why communism alone did not work for the Soviets or the Chinese. When Rockefeller and Kissinger taught them that capitalism was the way to riches and power, they saw it clearly when they strengthened and improved the educational resources for their people. Opportunities increased and the people prospered.
So we cannot allow our country to lose these great opportunities or we will lose our government’s advantages on the world’s stage in many ways. We will also lose our Americanized travel conveniences and respect in the world. This only works to the PRC's advantages and their governmental system instead of ours.
There has recently been more people wanting to help our country, whether in the intelligence community or the military. That’s good news, but they are doing it because their gut is waking them up to the problem of transitional geopolitics. They "feel" a problem. They have anxiety because of it. They instinctually want to contribute to fix the problem(s). This isn’t the best reason to fight but it is the last reason. I say that because if we do not reverse the trend into a more US friendly outcome, then the decline continues and the tipping point of someone else leading the world becomes reality. And this new world political system will not necessarily be West friendly. Although the Chinese will certainly use us if they can, as long as it is to their advantage, and as long as we stop being a treat to their ambitions. Instead of the king of the world we will become the side chick. Sort of like what Russia is in the eyes of China. The side chick to get information from to help China. We will continue our consumer nation status and buy the Chinese products and continue to increase the wealth in the PRC instead of our own country. We will be used and abused. We will be, as the old saying goes, “Rode hard and put up wet.”
And we don’t want that. Who wants that? The Chinese and Russia. When pride falls danger lurks close behind. But we don't want WWIII either. We are stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Anyone in the intelligence community who doesn’t believe the economy and private sector tax base is directly attached to National Security is either ignorant, stupid, or an active agent for China or Russia.
And, our once American, but now American based globalist corporations no longer have as much incentive to remain loyal the the United States, another article for another day. Many of them became super wealthy through cheap Chinese labor and they certainly will not support policy changes that will add tariffs to Chinese goods or affect their globalist bottom line in other ways. A true globalist corporation with strong Chinese connections and wide profit margins due to their Chinese partners is not fully American, by default. They can be, but money is their God and their loyalties are not probably with the United States. I mean, come on. This isn’t rocket science. If an officer in the Agency received twice as much income from China as that officer collected with his US government paycheck, his motives would be questioned right? If an agent with the Bureau received millions or billions of dollars from China and only made a hundred (or less) grand from the US government, his motive would be questioned right? Corporations are no different. They will influence policy that benefits their bottom line and helps China. The friend of my wallet is a friend indeed, right? That is how many humans work, unfortunately. Seemingly, that's how Congress works. China has us by the balls in that respect.
And don’t think this article is only about the United States. It is about what can and/or will happen in every country that trades too much with China; particularly the developed nations who have more power and influence to lose. We have become accustomed to being at the top, but what now?
This trend will not only hurt the developed countries or continents. Other countries in continents such as South America and Africa and other underdeveloped countries. Look at the recent election win in Brazil, most likely a Chinese puppet. For a futuristic glimpse, just look how the Chinese government treats its people. A surveillance state. Say something negative and get detained or disappear forever. Spies don’t get put in jail; they are assassinated. No true freedom of speech or religion. Aggressive tactics. We don’t want that here or in South America or Mexico or any country right? In some intelligence circles they circulate the idea that China has become powerful because they are authoritarian and think long term. That might lead a group of people to err in thinking that we should do that in the United States. But that is wrong in so many ways. We should admit that Kissinger and Rockefeller are wrong and perhaps unduly influenced by the Soviets or China to aim us in that direction. We can't proceed without admitting we were wrong? Who wants to admit they were wrong? Russia admitted that communism didn't work and switched to capitalism and even the Chinese switched to a hybrid capitalistic economy to gain wealth. We gave them the tools for that rise. And that reason combined with the unbalanced trade is what caused their military and political power to grow. They have risen because we have given them the money (via unbalanced trade) to rise. We built their military with our American dollars. And they are winning because they have a long term blueprint and strategy. And because the continue subverting the US and other developed countries.
But here is the key to understanding. China and Russia will support legislation that benefits their World Domination agenda, but they will sharply oppose legislation that will strengthen American and weaken their long term plan to control the New World Order. You can bet your last dollar on that. It is how you see which helps the US and what hurts the US. This isn't just about elections - it is about US policy/law. Likewise, you will see the traitor corporations stand up and resist any legislation that benefits the US and is neutral or hurts China.
So, we see changes being made now, but hopefully not too late. And hopefully, not just for one four-year term. Further, let’s pray we will continue to not just survive but thrive at the community level and on the world stage. And that other countries will not have to suffer and can remain at least stable and happy without resorting to wars.
So on this 4th of July weekend, the future of my country is on my mind. I wish it the best and with that I wish our people the best. And I do not harbor bad feelings for Chinese or Russian citizens. I love everyone. No one can help where they were born or what their government is up to. Many of us want to thrive and nearly all of us want to at least survive.
Remember this. One cannot rise without another falling. That is simple math, not unproven theory. There is not such thing in the real world as equality, only uneducated losers. There will always be that one or more countries who want to be the leader of the world and are willing to go to great lengths to ensure they are the top dog. Before China entered the WTO, they did not have a chance. But Kissinger and Rockefeller gave them the tools to rise and become our peer competitor. Call it Chinese assertiveness or Chinese aggression, but most of us know where it is headed. They are the rising lion and they see our weaknesses and will attack only when they feel strong enough. Shame on us if we continue to devolve and allow ourselves to weekend. We cannot be strong through debt, but only cash liquidity and a strong citizenry. Weaken either, and there will be chaos. Change must come before we have to focus all of our resources on an unhappy population and domestic issues. China will then have free reign to build their world throne.
Good day and God bless.
No comments:
Post a Comment