Can Blogs Avert World War III?

 My BlogSpot Can Blogs Save the World was created in 2009.  It is ironic that many of the articles that were written about the future have come true and are being noticed by people with real influence.  I mean, who cares about what a southerner with an Alabama upbringing says? He is clearly behind the times, right?  Those in New York and California – they are the smartest ones when it comes to geopolitics and international economics right?  Well, hard times bring new ideas as the boat sinks apparently.

My introduction article in 2009 says, 

I envision this blog as a way to discuss some current topics, some of the topics may be complex and/or controversial.  However, anything nowadays that gets our minds to thinking out of the box I am all for it.

Let's start with "ideas or visions", transform them to "blogs", allow our brains to "absorb" the information, whilst we bounce them (the ideas) around a little, and then "save the world" ;) Let's also enjoy the fellowship while we do it!!!

The irony of the name of my blog is that it is called “Can Blogs Save the World?”  This name is visionary considering that much of my political theory posts were about China’s rise and the decline of the US due to unbalanced trade deficits. Basically, us giving China trillions of dollars as apposed to them giving us mere thousands through the greatest trade imbalance and transfer of wealth that the world has ever seen.  Likewise with each passing year, China became richer and we became poorer (in debt).  Decades of this has brought us to this point.  

Who besides me continually says stupid stuff like, “China entered the World Trade Organization (WTO) on 12/11/2001 exactly two months after the 9/11/2001 World Trade Tower Attacks may not be a coincidence.”  It was the same day of the month, on the 11th.  Wow.  Brilliance.  It's like someone wanted to screw with our heads.  In one day, in one attack, our intelligence and financial resources suddenly shifted off of China and Russia and to the Middle East, overnight.  No one seemed to care about the China and WTO connection.  It was an unseen ghost that would one day become visible and change the world.  You know.  Stuff like huge transfers of wealth and power to China and BRICS and alliances and world influence and Taiwan.  Also, China building military bases in other countries and building alliances with those countries that will ultimately benefit the PRC.  World domination kind of stuff.

So, did Russia and/or China train some terrorists in the sand of Saudi Arabia to fly planes into the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001 for strategic purposes to hide their entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO)?  Or was there motive to shift intelligence resources away from Russia and China and shift to the Middle East and domestic issues at home?  Did the terrorists get the idea from the plane that hit David Rockefeller’s Chase Manhattan building on 5th Avenue years ago?  Theory or fact?  Who knows really?  If it happened, are any of the strategic planners, influencers or people with knowledge of it still alive?  Perhaps we killed them all in retaliation. Perhaps they lived to be a hundred and cashed out just before the Cold War was brought back to life.  Conspiracy theory?  If there were outside influences that gave the idea and supported the terrorists that day, would we ever hear of it?  Even if we found proof, what would we do about it at this point?  Go to war?  Easy to beat Iraq but not so much larger countries.

Motive.  We ask questions like, “Did and do the Chinese and Russians want the West to decline or fall while they take the lead in World Politics?”  Sure.  Absolutely.  Russia, in particular, seems butthurt all the time about the power of the West.  It is no secret.  “Was the motive for China and/or Russia to give ideas and intelligence to terrorists to commit the attacks?”  Sure, there was plenty of motive.  They knew the US would bomb the hell out of the Middle East and make new enemies there while they took the neutral approach and utilized the great opportunities to network while of staying out of the war.  Certainly they strategically networked and significantly improved their relations in other countries. Opportunists or strategic planners?   Were they smart enough to know that the US would take most of its intelligence resources off of China and Russia and divert a large portion of its money, time and people to the Middle East and domestic terrorism.  Means and Ends.  If the goal was to shift US intelligence off or Russia and China onto something else, then what means would bring the end?  The end goal question, “What is required for the US to quit spending resources on collecting intelligence on China and Russia to allow them to covertly plot and take over the New World Order in the upcoming decades.  Plan for the century, not just one Presidential or Congressional term.  Not one CIA director's term.  No one FBI director's term.  Does it now make more sense that Putin has been in power since 1999 and Xi Jinping since 2012.  But it was Putin in power just before the 9/11 attacks, not Xi Jinping.  Did Putin have boots on the ground in the sands of Afghanistan at the time?  Sure he did.  Doesn't mean for certain Russia had anything at all to do with the attacks but certainly there was plenty of motive and having a strong Rockefeller and NYC presence with plenty of communication and contact, the Russians surely knew about the airplane that hit Rockefeller's bank on 40 Wall Street.  That's recorded history but probably still on the tongue of many people, especially David Rockefeller (at least, while he was alive).

In all civil and criminal court cases the smartest of judges and lawyers understand that MOTIVE is important.  Without motive, there is no criminal case and the guy is almost always innocent.  But if there is motive, particularly STRONG MOTIVE, then it increases the probability that the person or country is GUILTY.  Do the Chinese and Russians have motive for us to use all of our intelligence resources domestically and continue to keep our eyes off of them?  Absolutely.  Do the Chinese and Russian have motive for us to fight internally?  Absolutely. Do they have motives for us to bankrupt our nation and lose credit among all of the other nations in the world?  Absolutely.  Would they want our people poor and perhaps a revolution started in the United States?  Absolutely.  Would they want a change of government and influence elections and put in their puppets to change policy and law that benefits the Chinese?  Absolutely.  I’ve said this before and will say it again, “It’s cheaper to bribe a politician than build a missile. It’s cheaper to bribe Congress than go to war.”  You can quote me on that. 

I mean who gave these foreign sand terrorists the idea to use airplanes anyway?  Admittedly, fresh ideas can occasionally pop into someone's head but usually not.  Usually, the brain uses repetition, not creativity.  Perhaps the idea came from someone or a group of people in NYC who had firsthand experience with an airplane hitting NYC buildings?  The Empire State building in 1945.  The Chase Manhattan building on 40 Wall Street in 1946.  Moreover, the Twin towers were often dubbed Nelson and David [Rockefeller] by the press because of their family’s involvement in donating the land for the UN and their influence and involvement in the towers.  

BTW, 40 Wall Street is better known by its current name – The Trump Building.  And the Trump Organization owned the old Chase Manhattan building in 2001 during the time of the attacks.  Again, at least hundreds of thousands of people have passed through the building over the years and a certain percentage heard the story about the plane crashing into it.  

Even though my belief that the idea of the 9/11/2001 plane attacks came from the airplane that hit David Rockefeller’s building, I obviously cannot say who.  Certainly, I can't see a benefit to David Rockefeller or Donald Trump.  Thousands of people have frequented Chase Manhattan and The Trump Tower over the year and the history might even be still circulating around with its current owner and employees.  And let's not forget that a plane hit the Empire State Building and lots of people probably remember that history as well.   But what does seem to confirm that the information was somehow connected to David Rockefeller or his Chase Manhattan building (in my mind) is David Rockefeller's connection to the Twin Towers.  This combined with the airplane hitting his bank, Chase Manhattan.  David was born in 1915 so the airplane was certainly on his mind.  He most likely visited the site of the crash.  He also admitted to watching the planes hit the towers in real time as he smoked a cigar in an adjacent building (Memoirs; David Rockefeller).  And David also  had a tremendous amount of influence.  That rascal was somehow given the green light to make many travels to Moscow and visit with leadership of the Soviet Union and China and yet was not even be suspected as being a double agent of agent of the Soviets.  Or even influenced (directly or indirectly) by the Soviets.  Did David Rockefeller have CIA connections.  Absolutely, in my mind there is no doubt.  Just as he had Soviet connections and PRC connections and Henry Kissinger connections.  David Rockefeller who alongside his buddy Henry Kissinger used their influence to push the détente with China on all of us which included China’s entrance into the WTO exactly two months after the tower attacks.  

Let’s face it, Rockefeller lobbied successfully for all of the trade agreements that shut down much of the manufacturing in the US including NAFTA.  They did so by explaining that we would still hold onto the tech sector and stay ahead of China.  Did China agree to stay away from the tech sector?  Not to my knowledge but we are now complaining about it as if we expected them to stay away from tech if we gave them our manufacturing industry.  They certainly did not listen.  Perhaps a backroom handshake isn't' enough to "seal the deal?"  Consequently, the manufacturing sector been nearly destroyed due to China.  The PRC is also on a fast rising pace with the tech sector, military technology and equipment as well.  

So if the idea to transfer much of the wealth of the US over decades was to protect David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger's generation from nuclear war, it worked.  But it ended just before they died.  They both got made their 100th birthday but left us in a bad situation.  We are safe as long as we give China the unbalanced trade, basically giving them an excess of cash, but what happens now  that they have become more powerful, influentially, politically, monetarily, when we quit giving them that excess of cash? We will be no longer needed, hence increasing the risk of many undesired consequences of that.

So, I won’t get into details about the reasons behind the rise of China and decline of the developed countries because I already have half a dozen videos posted and blogs written about all of that from over 15 years ago.  You know, back when it would have been easier to slow it down or reverse the process without going into World War III with them.  When the caveman rubs two sticks together, he creates fire.  Likewise with politics, domestic or geopolitically, rubbing the sticks together too fast creates nuclear war.  A slower process of change lowers the risk of war.  Changes over a four year term might be too fast and too much friction and create fire (literally).

I did not initially intend today's blog to be about all of that.  My mind works in complicated rabbit holes.  My main intent is the same as my the name of my blog, "Can Blogs Change the World [for the better?]  Better means, freedom loving countries survive.  The focus of this article and many of the others was and is an attempt to get the world out and change current events in order to change future events and to divert them into a more palatable living for the West and its allies.  A different and more positive trajectory in the time line, short of a time machine to the future and seeing the world up in flames and coming back to warn everyone, I have tried to warn in advance.  

And I am not just talking about just a strong government, but also a strong citizenry.   Because if the citizens are weak the government will be weak.  After all, politicians come from the population right?  If the population is dumbed down and poor then Congress will be dumbed down and corrupt.

Almost everything comes down to resources and energy.  I am not talking about electricity.  I am talking about manpower, technology and focus.  What will we spend it on?  We certainly shifted way from China and Russia who have full motive to take us down as they rise.  There are more important things in the world than the Middle East.  Speaking of, who will have the most influence with them in the future if we do not change our thinking, policy and laws for a long term strategic plan.

Be strong, stay strong.  That's my idea.  We have to prioritize strengthening ourselves.  The young lion doesn't attack the old lion until he knows for certain the old lion cannot win.  Otherwise, he instinctually knows he will die.  Likewise, China will continued the strategy, infiltration and covert subversion until they know they are strong enough to win.  They are not stupid.

So, in my all so humble but strong opinion, there are many downsides to the United States declining and China continuing to rise.  And despite my jumping around to different yet interconnected subjects in today’s article, I will leave the final focus on this idea and the reason it absolutely has to be reversed, yet reversed in way that will not lead to World War III and particularly nuclear war and the end of the world.

The Untied States has benefited from being the most powerful country in the world.  People want to side with winners. They want to side with the rich and powerful, not the weak and 50 trillion in national debt.  They want to learn English, not Chinese.

It has benefited out intelligence community as well.  The adversary’s country sucks and the United States has money and other benefits that encourages information collection by the United States government.  So that’s a two-part system.  Again, US is great, their country sucks and treats them badly.  If the US ever, and I mean, ever, starts oppressing its own citizens and if China ever begins to treat theirs better, then there will be a problem. The US has benefited from being a great nation with a wealthy and happy population for many decades now.  China on the other hand did not.  But now that many of the major cities in the US are in decline and cities in China are incredible, things are beginning to change.  The transfer of wealth from the developed countries to China is a serious problem.  But if you stop the transfer immediately, there is a high risk for a major war.  If you stop it slowly, but consistently over a decade or two, then it might just work and tensions simmer.

So what happens if China becomes richer and the US becomes poorer?  China will have the advantages that the US has had for half a century.  Nearly all of those advantages.  Countries in the world will want China to build military bases on their native lands. They will want China’s assistance in intelligence matters.  They will supply China with information on China’s adversaries, and they will freely give the information to them.  Our county’s superpowers to turn an adversarial officer into a covert agent working for the US government will become increasingly more difficult, albeit nearly impossible.  For one thing we won’t have the budget to  turn them.  Secondly, China will have the money, power and influence to turn our officers into one of theirs. This isn’t even considering the private sector, where many of our intelligence officers and agents leave our government to work for a newly globalized private sector.  A powerful globalist private sector is another article to write another day as it poses as much of a security risk as anything else that is mentioned herein.

To simplify, what happens when the US has less money to spend on intelligence and counterintelligence and China has more money to spend on intelligence and counterintelligence?  China will exponentially hit that tipping point of no return.  The sort of tipping point that is quietly lurking below the icy waters like an iceberg awaiting the titanic to brush past and sink. 

I am not saying these things because I am angry or sad or despise the US in any way.  I am bringing it up because I love my country and want my family and descendants to have a great opportunity to live the good life, work hard and have a little something for their troubles.  You know, that thing they call “the American Dream.”  Because if you lose the dream, you lose the country.  And people aren’t stupid.  That’s why communism alone did not work for the Soviets or the Chinese. When Rockefeller and Kissinger taught them that capitalism was the way to riches and power, they saw it clearly when they strengthened and improved the educational resources for their people.  Opportunities increased and the people prospered. 

So we cannot allow our country to lose these great opportunities or we will lose our government’s advantages on the world’s stage in many ways.  We will also lose our Americanized travel conveniences and respect in the world.  This only works to the PRC's advantages and their governmental system instead of ours.

There has recently been more people wanting to help our country, whether in the intelligence community or the military.  That’s good news, but they are doing it because their gut is waking them up to the problem of transitional geopolitics.  They "feel" a problem.  They have anxiety because of it.  They instinctually want to contribute to fix the problem(s).  This isn’t the best reason to fight but it is the last reason.  I say that because if we do not reverse the trend into a more US friendly outcome, then the decline continues and the tipping point of someone else leading the world becomes reality.  And this new world political system will not necessarily be West friendly.  Although the Chinese will certainly use us if they can, as long as it is to their advantage, and as long as we stop being a treat to their ambitions.  Instead of the king of the world we will become the side chick.  Sort of like what Russia is in the eyes of China.  The side chick to get information from to help China.  We will continue our consumer nation status and buy the Chinese products and continue to increase the wealth in the PRC instead of our own country. We will be used and abused. We will be, as the old saying goes, “Rode hard and put up wet.”

And we don’t want that.  Who wants that?  The Chinese and Russia.  When pride falls danger lurks close behind.  But we don't want WWIII either. We are stuck between a rock and a hard place.

Anyone in the intelligence community who doesn’t believe the economy and private sector tax base is directly attached to National Security is either ignorant, stupid, or an active agent for China or Russia.  

And, our once American, but now American based globalist corporations no longer have as much incentive to remain loyal the the United States, another article for another day.  Many of them became super wealthy through cheap Chinese labor and they certainly will not support policy changes that will add tariffs to Chinese goods or affect their globalist bottom line in other ways.  A true globalist corporation with strong Chinese connections and wide profit margins due to their Chinese partners is not fully American, by default.  They can be, but money is their God and their loyalties are not probably with the United States.  I mean, come on.  This isn’t rocket science.  If an officer in the Agency received twice as much income from China as that officer collected with his US government paycheck, his motives would be questioned right?  If an agent with the Bureau received millions or billions of dollars from China and only made a hundred (or less) grand from the US government, his motive would be questioned right?  Corporations are no different.  They will influence policy that benefits their bottom line and helps China. The friend of my wallet is a friend indeed, right?  That is how many humans work, unfortunately.  Seemingly, that's how Congress works.  China has us by the balls in that respect.

And don’t think this article is only about the United States.  It is about what can and/or will happen in every country that trades too much with China; particularly the developed nations who have more power and influence to lose. We have become accustomed to being at the top, but what now?  

This trend will not only hurt the developed countries or continents.  Other countries in continents such as South America and Africa and other underdeveloped countries.  Look at the recent election win in Brazil, most likely a Chinese puppet.  For a futuristic glimpse, just look how the Chinese government treats its people.  A surveillance state.  Say something negative and get detained or disappear forever.  Spies don’t get put in jail; they are assassinated.  No true freedom of speech or religion.  Aggressive tactics.  We don’t want that here or in South America or Mexico or any country right?   In some intelligence circles they circulate the idea that China has become powerful because they are authoritarian and think long term.  That might lead a group of people to err in thinking that we should do that in the United States.  But that is wrong in so many ways.  We should admit that Kissinger and Rockefeller are wrong and perhaps unduly influenced by the Soviets or China to aim us in that direction. We can't proceed without admitting we were wrong?  Who wants to admit they were wrong?  Russia admitted that communism didn't work and switched to capitalism and even the Chinese switched to a hybrid capitalistic economy to gain wealth.  We gave them the tools for that rise.  And that reason combined with the unbalanced trade is what caused their military and political power to grow.  They have risen because we have given them the money (via unbalanced trade) to rise.  We built their military with our American dollars.  And they are winning because they have a long term blueprint and strategy. And because the continue subverting the US and other developed countries.

But here is the key to understanding.  China and Russia will support legislation that benefits their World Domination agenda, but they will sharply oppose legislation that will strengthen American and weaken their long term plan to control the New World Order.  You can bet your last dollar on that.  It is how you see which helps the US and what hurts the US.  This isn't just about elections - it is about US policy/law.  Likewise, you will see the traitor corporations stand up and resist any legislation that benefits the US and is neutral or hurts China.

So, we see changes being made now, but hopefully not too late.  And hopefully, not just for one four-year term.  Further, let’s pray we will continue to not just survive but thrive at the community level and on the world stage. And that other countries will not have to suffer and can remain at least stable and happy without resorting to wars.

So on this 4th of July weekend, the future of my country is on my mind.  I wish it the best and with that I wish our people the best.  And I do not harbor bad feelings for Chinese or Russian citizens.  I love everyone.  No one can help where they were born or what their government is up to.  Many of us want to thrive and nearly all of us want to at least survive.

Remember this.  One cannot rise without another falling. That is simple math, not unproven theory.  There is not such thing in the real world as equality, only uneducated losers.  There will always be that one or more countries who want to be the leader of the world and are willing to go to great lengths to ensure they are the top dog.  Before China entered the WTO, they did not have a chance.  But Kissinger and Rockefeller gave them the tools to rise and become our peer competitor. Call it Chinese assertiveness or Chinese aggression, but most of us know where it is headed.  They are the rising lion and they see our weaknesses and will attack only when they feel strong enough.  Shame on us if we continue to devolve and allow ourselves to weekend.  We cannot be strong through debt, but only cash liquidity and a strong citizenry.  Weaken either, and there will be chaos.  Change must come before we have to focus all of our resources on an unhappy population and domestic issues.  China will then have free reign to build their world throne.

Good day and God bless.

Jesus Wept

 Jesus wept (John 11:35). The shortest verse in the Bible. The profundity of its meaning seeps into my soul. Prior to crucifixion, Jesus was there for everyone who crossed His path or heard of Him. After His crucifixion and return, He is here for us all.  He healed the sick and gave sight to the blind.  He enabled the lame to walk and transitioned the deaf to hear.  He restored dignity and smooth skin to the lepers whereas beforehand everyone considered them repugnant. He showed love to adulterers and prostitutes. He reached out to the wealthy, the prideful, the materialistic and the politicians. He showed us that the poor were just as important as the rich, perhaps more so.  Yet, despite being there for everyone and despite healing and befriending thousands; who was there for him as he hung in pain, dripping of blood and dying on the cross? Who would take him down and save Him?  Only a trilogy of Marys and the disciple John remained with Him to the end.  The strongest chose themselves and in similar spirit, chose Barabbas instead of Christ.   Chose convenience and sin instead of inconvenience and repentance.  Thousands of people could have converged on the site, overpowered the guards, removed Him from the cross and repaired his wounds.  Yet, where was one person willing to inconvenience themselves just a little to give Him aid in His time of need?  Maybe they were cowards or perhaps disheartened, not understanding the profundity of why He had to hang there and die a physical death in the first place.  After all, surely God can save His own Son from death?  Surely the Son can save himself and not need help?  Is that not what a King does – save himself so that he may continue to save his people?  An all-powerful king saves who he saves and kills who he kills.  Yet Christ hung there.  When His body went limp with death, perhaps the memory of his miracles was forgotten even more.  God could have saved Jesus.  Jesus could have saved Jesus.  Assuredly, it wasn’t the people’s job to save Jesus.  He died and arose so that WE might be saved and arise.  He went through all of that knowing that we would leave him hanging so that He could be the empowered sacrificed Son that Isaac was not.  The strongest King does not need to save Himself because He conquers death.  Likewise, the weakest kings always die eventually.  Jesus became the last physically legitimate sacrifice for sin in the world.  He became the scapegoat that we cast our sins upon and He carries those sins away so that we might live. A humble donkey carried the King into Jerusalem for this ultimate and eternal sacrifice.  Christ, the humble yet great and powerful King, now carries the burdens and the weight of our heavy sins if we accept Him for His Word.  "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter of Jerusalem! Behold, your king comes to you, righteous and having salvation is he, humble and mounted on a donkey."  (Zechariah 9:9).

Advice

 "When we are young, we wish we could get advice from our older self. When old, we need advice from our younger self."

Dewayne Allday

Ode to Sunsets....

By Dewayne Allday 

A spring flower in December,

a whisper to remember,

the sunlight glistening on a ripple,

like diamonds and pearls.

Simple wiggle, little dimple,

why do you tease me so?

Don’t you know I love you,

My heart and mind you know.

A song singing in the wind,

a sound delightful to no end.

A soft bird singing love songs,

sunlight glistening on his wings.

A wind blowing from the east

bringing a fragrance fit for kings

and memories to remember

jousting my heart as it seems.

Ode to sunsets, I say who,

I dew, I dew, I dew love you.

Ode to sunsets, I say red,

painting the water,

her paint brush said.

Ode to sunsets, I say blue,

the sun has gone,

and a calm is due.

Spend Resources on the Disease, not the Symptoms

 As certain countries in the world continue to grow increasingly aligned with Russia and China and the BRICs financial system (shifting away from the US Dollar), or as countries turn to a more neutral or adversarial role concerning the West, it should be obvious that we as Americans, and our allies, who know the dangers of the extreme right and the extreme left, should invest in the United States, and in each other, despite past, current or future problems.  

Even if it is a knee jerk reaction, hopefully many are finding new energy, motivation, and wising up to and attempting to strategize and repair the core basis of these problems for America's long term survival and more so, the survival and successful flourishment of old school Western thought on freedoms, justice, growth and survivability, so that our children and grandchildren and great grandchildren will not be born into a Third World country in this great land, and not be born into a fallen country that is and will be continuously manipulated and controlled as a pawn and satellite by its present day adversaries.  

Instead of focusing all our government's attention and resources on the symptoms of decline (rising domestic issues, etc.), the decline should be a-politically reverse engineered, analyzed and corrected in appropriate steps that ensure future survival and success while carefully and strategically maintaining peace in the world.  And it  needs to be completed ASAP and by the correct people.

If the decline is real, and it is my strong opinion that certainly it is  real floating around with great collection of direct and indirect evidence that point to the decline, then it is also real that a few future symptoms of continued decline are increased American struggles, protests, open rebellion, etc.  

It is better strategically to fight the disease, not the symptoms.  Fighting the symptoms is spinning in circles and a waste of valuable resources and lives.  The disease, in my opinion, is (are) the same things that I have discussed for two decades; the building China's weaponry, world dominance and influence with our own American dollars through exponentially buying their products, building their factories, and giving them the tools and the money to take over the world.  We are by far the largest net importer in the world. Almost every European country was at least smart enough to be a net exporter instead of net importer.  Even though net exports, they still had Chinese imports that enriched China and consequently, Chinas allies.  

When we closed our factories down and encouraged the building of those factories in China, we closed our private sector tax base, shrunk the U.S. Treasury, increased the National Debt, and have yet to admit that all of this is not only a very serious National Security Risk, but perhaps the biggest National Security Risk in the history of our young country.  It brings with it problems that are yet to be discovered and undoubtedly will be the largest since the formation of the United States.  As our factories closed, so did our tax revenue and consequently our National Debt increased as we imprisoned and destroyed the lives and future of those who lost hope during the factory closings and transitions to this intertwined New World Order, as they have been calling it.  Was the true motive of globalism profit or a more peaceful world. It certainly was sold as creating a more peaceful world.  That peace doesn't seem to be working out.  As the US factory base closed and moved to China, we adversely affected a large segment of the population that just were not designed to moved into the tech sector.  And, there were no promises that China would not invade our tech sector after they had built all of the factories and used American dollars to do so.  Not only that, we continually encourage the migration of cheap labor and this process has further escalated that bleeding of American factory jobs and increased our prison populations.

The propensity of future protests, future rebellions, future revolutions or future civil wars can be reversed and stopped strategically a decade in advance instead of continuing a bad path and later instigating things further by killing or arresting future Americans.  To change future history, the investigation, analysis, conclusions and concrete steps (open and covert) for the mitigated reversal of an incredibly bad path must not wait until the time arrives before implementation.  The Chinese and Russians and Iranians and their other allies would love to see the every resource in the United States tied up in fighting its own domestic issues.  Tying up all of our country's valuable resources on these domestic issues will certainly  enable our adversaries free reign on the world.  It will also increase the debt and prison populations and lower the tax base even more.

A free man pays taxes into the US Treasury and no matter what he mouths out about politics, he still supports the government through his money and his community service.  A man in prison is a drain on the system who collectively and continually increases the National Debt.  Not a single government or government contract job is a net contributor to the U.S. Treasury.  The taxes they pay cannot even pay their own salary much less the car they drive, building they are housed in, utility bills, benefits.  Long term, an increasing prison population is unsustainable just like an increasing government job base and shrinking private sector is unsustainable.  Take a man and put him in prison and in doing so, take the entire net taxes (in theory) of ten private sector tax paying men and use 100% of that income to pay for the one inmate.  Unsustainable.  I'm not saying release the murderers on death row, I'm simply saying that globalism increased the prison populations in the United States.  The factories closed and the factories were all that a certain class of people had to get a job, hold it, find productive purpose and stay out of trouble.  Only so many of these men can cut grass for others.  Globalism took them out of jobs and the War on Drugs crime laws took them out of society.  Only so many can replace the college kids at the fast food restaurants and become lifetime fast food cashiers or cooks.  Say what you will, but this idea of a huge prison population is one of the most logical reasons, outside of hatred, that Hitler really gassed the Jews.  The Jews were starving to death in his prison camps via shortages of food or a way to provide for them.  

We either increase the private sector's tax base exponentially by limiting imports from inferior waged countries (especially imports from our adversaries) or we keep increasing the per capita ratio of our nation's prison population and keep enriching our adversaries in multiple ways.  

Easier said than done right?  Not really.  Tariffs on China and Russia but no tariffs on our allies and/or equally waged countries.  The increased price of those Chinese goods  hit by the tariffs will cause the prices on the Chinese goods to increase which will encourage more made in America products to be purchased.  Long term it will cause existing American factories to be built or expanded.  But few American factory is going to trust and spend millions or billions of dollars in expansions or start ups if the tariffs are for one Presidential term only. That would be foolish.  These complications have to be sorted out ahead of time.  And, Americans deserve some of that tariff money back to replace some of the income lost in through the increased prices of the tariffs.

The rise of global monopolies is another National Security threat.  People can say what they want, but outside of exceptions to the rule, money influences though and foreign investments are no different.  If thirty percent of an American based globalist monopoly's money is brought in from our chief adversary (China), then it is not smart to allow those same people to directly or indirectly influence or be in charge of any American economic or political policy or law regarding the tariffs on China.  It will not be to these companies benefit to hurt their bottom line by transitioning away from China and Russia.   And building a new relationship with Indonesia and the Philippines (or whoever) to transition away from China and to get the same cheap labor from those countries will not help the shrinking American tax base or bring American factories back.  The population loss to either a government job or to prison will continue.

Despite being an American based company, they have an undivided interest in protecting their cash flow and their cash flow is directly dependent on China.  If a globalist monopoly is publicly traded, they are loyal to their company and investors.  Global monopolies are a fairly new threat that have not been properly analyzed.   Years ago American monopolies were nearly 100% domestic in the U.S. and therefore had strongest desires to support the long term success and growth of the United States.  For the first time in history, the last forty years (since early 90s), that is no longer the case.  Not only do the large businesses and monopolies have divided loyalties, the entire American population were instructed and encouraged to invest their retirement portfolios in Asian stocks and mutual funds.  We are all in to China's rise and takeover of the world, it seems.  The days of American based loyalties (in general) through strong allegiances to the United States have been severely weakened by this detente and merger with the Chinese economy. Thank-you Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller for these serious National Security threats.  If a CIA officer received monetary contributions of a million dollars (or billions) from the Chinese or Russians, then certainly that would be noticed and be considered a betrayal and/or security concern.  You wouldn't put that guy in charge of US policy.  You might just arrest him for treason.  It is no different with globalist monopolies who influence U.S. policy which directly determines the survivability of the United States on the world stage.  Loyalty is important and common sense is equally important.  At a minimum, it is ethically wrong and a serious conflict of interests to the National Security of the United States to have this sort of foreign influence over policy.  

As much as I've protested Elon's rise and questioned his motives, I never said that I disagreed with many of his thoughts or ideas.  Two decades before he Elon publicly stated it, I was suggesting IQ tests for Congress and the President and other top leadership positions.  But the truth is that the smartest person in the world can do the most damage in the world if they have an evil, vindictive, or self serving heart.  A dumb boy can barely get out  of his own backyard of influence but a very smart boy can conquer the world and the world be at his mercy.  He might chose us today, but he is not limited to America any longer.  Clearly Elon isn't that smartest person in the word, having a gifted IQ (reportedly) but he certainly has managed to focus on promoting his brand and influence worldwide and currently he has as much or more influence than about anyone else in the entire world. That means that if he is good, then things can be good, but if he has a black heart, and especially a black and impulsive heart, then the world is certainly in danger.  He wasn't born here.  He sees himself as a world leader (in my opinion).  Time will show his true intent, heart and loyalties.